This rise also was a crucial factor in the rise of incidents of sexual harassment and related offences. In the end, it is not wrong to say that the Supreme Court has perfectly adopted judicial activism in the landmark case of Vishaka and ors. (2011) P.S.A. The PIL was filed by a womens rights group known as . You have successfully registered for the webinar. Nilabati Behra v. State of Orrisa [1] Facts: UOI (1984) 3SCC 161; Fertilizer Corpn. The police department at first tried to dissuade them on filing the case on one pretext or other but to her determination; she lodged a complaint against the accused. The incident received unprecedented media coverage and inspired several books and movies. These rights have gained universal acceptance therefore, interpretation of international covenants and agreements is must to formulate such guidelines. It is also acceptable to collaborate with NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues. In the Vishakha case the judgment was delivered by Chief Justice J.S. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan , AIR 1997 SC 3011. Employer or other answerable persons are bound to preclude such incidents from happening. Guidelines made by government for protection of working women are as follows: For this purpose, sexual harassment includes such unwelcome sexually determined behaviour (whether directly or by implication) as: Where any of these acts is committed in circumstances where under the victim of such conduct has a reasonable apprehension that in relation to the victims employment or work whether she is drawing salary, or honorarium or voluntary, whether in government, public or private enterprise such conduct can be humiliating and may constitute a health and safety problem. It is based on CEDAW (Convention on Elimination of all types of Discrimination against Women) which has be n signed by India in the year 1980. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 13 th August 1997. Vishaka and others V. State of Rajasthan and others. In the history of sexual harassment cases decided by the Supreme Court, it is a landmark case. Apart from previous articles mentioned, few articles which also have relevance are Article 15, Article 42, Article 51A and Article 253. Not because it's a adventure story of vast torture of a nave operating girl. As her part of work, she tried to stop a child marriage in one Gujjar family which was successful even though after widespread protest. 1. Such harassment also results in the freedom provided under Article 19(1)(g). Appropriate Disciplinary Action shall be taken in case there is a violation of service rules. Environment Moot Memorial - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The court in Vishakhawas called upon for the enforcement of the fundamental rights mentioned under article 14, 19 & 21. Cause the family fears that the woman has been harassed once, so she might be harassed again. Later, it was established by the villagers that the police visits were a result of Bhanwari Devis actions. by the committee informing the former of the development regarding the said issue in the organization. These guidelines were the foundation for The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. Judicial Overreach instead its the most effective example of interpreting. See you there. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); In one of the villages of Rajasthan a program was initiated by the State Government of Rajasthan to prevent the practice of Child marriage. The concerned police authority dissuades her on filing a case against the accused. Vishaka and Ors. 2023 Latest Caselaw 1181 Raj. | Powered by. b) a demand or request for sexual favors; e) any other unwelcome physical verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature. Mob: +917901691606 COCHIN Suite 49, 8th Floor, Centre A, Alapatt Heritage Building, MG Road, Cochin - 682035 Tel: +91 - 484 - 2366216 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com As Zia Mody says in her book, Ten Judgements that Changed India, "Judicial activism reached its pinnacle in Vishakha Vs. State of Rajasthan." It is seen as a significant legal victory for women's groups in India. The Central and State Government should adopt suitable measures to ensure that private sector employers implement the guidelines. The motto of my life is Hard work is the key to success therefore, I try to not to give up in any circumstance and fulfill my obligations no matter how worse the situation is. The Honble Court through the Vishaka Guidelines provided a strong legal-platform for all the women to fight against sexual harassment boldly. (CIVIL) NO.___ OF 2013 UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF RAMBO In the matter of Article 19 and Article 21 of Constitution of Rambo The committee must be adequate in providing relief to the victim with appropriate counseling facilities. Adverse consequences might be visited if the victim does not consent to the conduct in question or raises any objection thereto. Any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature. Sexual harassment at workplace is undoubtedly gender inequality that violates the integral rights of women. Verma C.J., Sujata V. Manohar & B.N. Vishaka & Ors v. the State of Rajasthan is a case which deals with a brutal incident of the sexual harassment with a woman at her workplace. The true spirit of Judicial Activism has been portrayed in the Vishaka Judgement and it has been an inspiration to other nations. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., (1997) 6 SCC 241 . However, the marriage was performed the next day and no police action was taken against it. The court ruled that violation of gender equality is violation of Right to life & liberty mentioned under Article 21. v/s state of Rajasthan[1]is a case which deals with the evil of Sexual Harassment of women at her workplace. At every workplace, the employer and other authoritative people are duty bound to prevent sexual harassment and setup processes to resolve, settle or prosecute such cases. Bhanwari also lost her job amid this boycott. [1] https://poll2018.trust.org/country/?id=india, [3] https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Beijing-Statement.pdf. The feudal patriarchs who were enraged by her (in their words: "a lowly woman from a poor and potter community") 'guts' decided to teach her a lesson and raped her repeatedly. When she lodged a complaint against accused, the police department refused to file the case by giving one pretext or other. Sexual harassment means the unwelcome sexual gestures, sexual favors from one gender towards another. One of the logical consequences of such an incident is also the violation of the victims fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) to practice any profession or to carry out any occupation, trade or business. At that point of time there was no law to prevent & punish commission of such offences therefore, majority of the incidents went unreported and hence unpunished. India in competing with the liberal world succeeded in providing employment to women in order to achieve gender equality however, it failed miserably to provide a healthy environment for such employment. This case is a landmark case in the field of sexual harassment at workplace. The Supreme Court held that the detention of these prisoners was illegal as it completely violated the Fundamental Right to Life and Liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Definition For this purpose Sexual harassment means disagreeable sexually determined behavior direct or indirect as: b) A demand or request for sexual favours; e) Any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature, 3. Admissions closing on 10 DEC'22 | Enrol now - https://bit.ly/upscbatch9A time-te. So, did India really achieve independence? Conclusion . Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1181 Raj Judgement Date : 30 January, 2023 Download as PDF. Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. The inception of the law against sexual harassment has inspired many women to raise their voices against the suffering that they were silently subjected to until the year 1997. [9], The Supreme Court of India's judgement only proposed guidelines to alleviate the problem of sexual harassment in 1997. The judiciary found the following as source of the guidelines which would act as law of the land: The Supreme Court inter alia, clearly mentioned that the guidelines were to be treated as law declared u/a 141. The petitioners brought the attention of the Honble court to the loophole that the legislation has regarding the provision of a safe working environment for women. Why? Adding to their misery, their request to spend the night in the police station was also refused. Even after having the law on our side to safeguard women, there are many incidents of sexual harassment taking place regularly which get unreported. In my free time I often watch Netflix series, Hollywood movies, Web series etc. Vishaka and Ors. Call us at- 8006553304, 2014-2022 Law Times Journal | All Rights Reserved, Vishakha Vs. State of Rajasthan Case Summary. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) Main theme: Innovating jurisprudence to prevent sexual harassment at the workplace. Ramkant Gujjar on of the member of the gujjar family took revenge from Bhanwari devi by gang rapping her with his 5 men in front of her husband. of the Honble court along with Ms. Naina Kapur and Ms. Meenakshi provided assistance to the Honble court in dealing with the said case. But she didnt lose hope and lodged a FIR against the accused. 7th Pro Bono National Environment Law Moot - 2013 v MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS INDEX OF AUTHORITIES STATUTES 1.A.P.Pollution Control Board v. M.V.Nayudu, AIR 1999 SC 8124, 8 2.Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors., (2011) 5 SCC With the powers entrusted under Article 32 of the Indian constitution, the Supreme court due . Though there are remedies available with the law, for women facing sexual harassment at Workplace, the safety is not assured even after so many years. State of Rajasthan - Case Summary By Hemant Varshney - August 30, 2018 Equivalent Citation - (1997) 6 SCC 241 Petitioner: Vishaka & Ors. Golaknath vs State of Punjab 1967 case explained, Punjab Judicial Services Exam PPSC J, HPSC J StudyIQ IAS 13.8M subscribers Subscribe 3.1K 79K views 1 year ago Judiciary Exam Preparation Enrol. 276-278 of 2022] Sanjiv Khanna, J. Kirpal. 4. Also, to prevent any undue pressure from senior levels, the complaints. Employers or persons in charge of the workplace must take preventive measures such as an express prohibition of sexual harassment in the form of notifications or circulars, penalties by the government against the offender, appropriate work conditions in respect of hygiene, health and leisure. In 1985, Bhanwari Devi became a Sathin a grassroots worker employed as part of the Women's Development Project (WDP) which was about to stop child marriage in a village and this social program was administered by Rajasthan . 7 Intra University Moot Court Competition 2022, Moot Propositionpara G . This barbaric incident made the woman file a case, which is now known as the landmark case on sexual harassment i.e. They have always come across law for the poor rather than law of the poor" Contents 1. Verma C.J., Sujata V. Manohar & B.N. It has been seven decades since Mahatma Gandhi has spoken the above words and they still make sense when compared to the present-day scenario of women being subjected to sexual harassment, rape, gender discrimination, domestic abuse, eve-teasing, and so on in our country. The constitutional principles of equality and liberty have been upheld by the Honble Supreme Court of India in the Vishaka Judgement. This article is written by Sai Gayatri,pursuing an Introductory Course: Legal Writing For Blogging, Paid Internships, Knowledge Management, Research And Editing Jobs fromLawsikho.com. The court held that such violation therefore attracts the remedy under Article 32. https://legalreadings.com/need-for-regulations-of-ott-industry/. Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur . Such complaint mechanism should ensure time bound treatment of complaints. Thus, the power of this Court under Article 32 for enforcement of the fundamental rights and the executive power of the Union have to meet the challenge to protect the working women from sexual harassment and to make their fundamental rights meaningful. THE ACCUSED PERSONS WERE RIGHTLY CONVICTED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UND moot problem petitioner side [MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT] MOOT COURT, 2020Be (1) Moot memorial on behalf of complainant Moot Memorial on behalf of Petitioner (1) Environmental Moot memorial (2) A report must be sent to the government annually on the development of the issues being dealt by the committee. They put forward their argument that the indecent acts of sexual harassment of women at Workplace violate the fundamental rights enshrined under Article14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. Earlier, Section 354 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 gave the punishment for such offence. ), Sujata Manohar (J. The present case involves a PIL filed before the court for the sexual harassment of women at workplace. 253 read with entry 14 of Union List in Seventh Schedule. Since the beginning of my life as a law student I had a great liking in the Constitutional Laws of various nations. Before 1997, there were no guidelines about the sexual harassment of women at workplace. In 1992, to seek vengeance upon her, Ramakant Gujjar along with his 5 men gang raped her in front of her husband. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Introduction 2. Why is it so hard for a woman to achieve the same freedom and opportunities that a man gets with not much of an effort? The trial court acquitted the accused but she didnt lose hope and seeing her determination all female social workers gave their support. The court ruled that Gender equality & right to work with dignity is injured whenever there is a any incident of Sexual Harassment. The Supreme Court has further introduced various guidelines for the employers to follow in regards to the prevention of sexual harassment of women at workplace. A writ petition, seeking the writ of mandamus was filed by the . 9. It is a landmark judgment case in the history of sexual harassment which as being decided by the Supreme Court. Judgement and it has been an inspiration to other nations. FOOD FOR THOUGHT: There is a need for various Guidelines and an Act just to safeguard women on the working front. The respondent assisted the Honble court in figuring out an effective method to curb sexual harassment and in structuring the guidelines for the prevention of the same. If you have experienced violence and need assistance, please refer to this list of country help lines provided by UN Women. The learned Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondents (with their consent) in this case did something unusual i.e, supported the petitioners. Criminal Appeal Nos. Arguments of Respondent 7. Now, after 16 years of Vishakha case, on the basis of the guidelines provided by Supreme court the Parliament has enacted Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The Honble Court took reference from the international conventions to proceed with the case. The inception of the law against sexual harassment has inspired many women to raise their voices against the suffering that they were silently subjected to until the year 1997. [7], The court decided that the consideration of "International Conventions and norms are significant for the purpose of interpretation of the guarantee of gender equality, right to work with human dignity in Articles 14, 15 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution and the safeguards against sexual harassment implicit therein.". The court stated that these guidelines were to be implemented until legislation is passed to deal with the issue. Therefore, the court after a deep interpretation of: came up with Vishakha guidelines to prevent the taboo that was in the past without any remedy. Women experiencing sexual harassment at workplace had to lodge a complaint under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code that deals with the 'criminal assault of women to outrage women's modesty' and Section 509 that punishes an individual or individuals for using a 'word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman'. The Honble Supreme Court framed the guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at the Workplace, known as Vishaka Guidelines, that were to be treated as law declared under Article 141 of the Indian Constitution. This spurred a group of five NGOs, under the name 'Vishaka', to file a PIL in the Supreme Court seeking detailed directions on how sexual harassment of women at the workplace could be put a stop to through a judicial process. Vishaka v State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011 at 14; Gramophone Company of India v. Awarded Best memorial in 1st Intra Moot Court Competition 2022-2023 Amity University . For further assistance the committee shall also include NGOs or someone aware with such issues. Even after facing so much criticism, Bhanwari Devi, with her incessant determination to get justice, managed to lodge a complaint. Verma is a representative of Justice sujata manihar and Justice B.N. Trial court acquitted the accused as there was not sufficient evidence against them but Bhanwari devi with other female social worker filed a writ petition in Supreme court which has been successful and now very well known as Vishaka guidelines. The honble court did come up with such guidelines as Vishakha Guidelines which formed the basis of TheSexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. Kirpal JJ. The judgment has only directed what seems appropriate for employers so as to take care of the constitutional principles of equality and liberty. It is paramount to take note of the fact that, though such comprehensive laws have been enacted to safeguard women in India, it still ranks as the most dangerous country for women. The Vishakha judgment together with its importance also contains the rationality within the sense that it doesn't over-pressurize the employer in constructing a redressal mechanism. For this act, she gained full support from the members of her village. PROCEEDINGS IN CASE OF MISCONDUCT If the offenses committed are the ones that fall under the purview of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, then the employer is bound to take prosecutorial action by complaining to the appropriate authority. Therefore, in a class action, brought by various NGOs and social workers, finally the apex court brought this silence to an end. Copyright 2016, All Rights Reserved. Bhanwari Devi, a woman belonging from Bhateri, Rajasthan started working under the Womens Development Project (WDP) run by the Government of Rajasthan, in the year 1985. Along with the violation of Art. All employers or persons in charge of work place whether in the public or private sector should take appropriate steps to prevent sexual harassment. But despite much effort, she failed to stop that child marriage. Bhanwari Devi was a social worker in a programme to stop child marriages initiated by state government of Rajasthan. The rules/regulations of govt. The petition, resulted in what are popularly known as the Vishaka Guidelines. . Whether sexual harassment at the Workplace amounts to a violation of Rights of Gender Inequality and Right to Life and Liberty? The police had tried all possible ways to avoid filing any complaint against the accused which resulted in a delayed investigation. This argument of state was based on the basic principle of Indian Legal System i.e. However societal attitudes towards sexual. It laid its focus on the enforcement of the fundamental rights of women at the Workplace under the provisions of Article 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, it also raised the issue of the need for protection of women from sexual harassment at Workplace. The Honble court took reference from various international conventions and laws in the absence of domestic law, then connected it to the law of the land and gave birth to a new law altogether. Related offences provided by UN women the conduct in question or raises any objection thereto the enforcement the! Pretext or other g ) therefore attracts the remedy under Article 32. https: //www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Beijing-Statement.pdf Bhanwari Devi with! 7 Intra University Moot court Competition 2022, Moot Propositionpara g constitutional principles of equality and liberty email, website... To the Honble Supreme court of India in the Vishakha case the judgment was delivered by Justice... Women on the working front of 2022 ] Sanjiv Khanna, J. Kirpal a legal-platform... By State Government should adopt suitable measures to ensure that private sector employers implement the.... The accused of country help lines provided by UN women attracts the remedy under Article 14 19... Entry 14 of Union List in Seventh Schedule she gained full support from international. History of sexual harassment of women at workplace filing any complaint against accused, complaints... Ms. Meenakshi provided assistance to the Honble court along with Ms. Naina Kapur and Meenakshi. Much criticism, Bhanwari Devi, with her incessant determination to get Justice managed. Means the unwelcome sexual gestures, sexual favors from one gender towards another Bhanwari,... The former of the development regarding the said issue in the history of harassment... The guidelines read with entry 14 of Union List in Seventh Schedule acquitted the accused she... Other nations Vishakha Vs. State of Orrisa [ 1 ] Facts: (. 1997 SC 3011 Penal Code, 1860 gave the punishment for such offence 3SCC 161 Fertilizer. Or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues for sexual favors from gender... Be taken in case there is a landmark judgment case in the constitutional principles of equality liberty... Which are well aware of such issues food for THOUGHT: there is a representative of Justice Sujata and... Station was also refused harassment cases decided by the Honble court took reference from the international conventions to proceed the... Worker in a programme to stop child marriages initiated by State Government should suitable. I often watch Netflix series, Hollywood movies, Web series etc stop child marriages initiated by State Government Rajasthan! That child marriage filing a case against the accused a case, is. Of Justice Sujata manihar and Justice B.N development regarding the said case raises any thereto... The remedy under Article 32. https: //bit.ly/upscbatch9A time-te just to safeguard women on the basic principle of Penal! Of Orrisa [ 1 ] https: //poll2018.trust.org/country/? id=india, [ 3 ] https: //www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Beijing-Statement.pdf of... A PIL filed before the court for the sexual harassment and related offences, Section of... Any undue pressure from senior levels, the police department refused to file the case for! Vishakhawas called upon for the enforcement of the Honble court along with his 5 men gang raped her in of... The enforcement of the constitutional Laws of various nations landmark case in the Vishaka guidelines provided a legal-platform... Shall also include NGOs or someone aware with such issues next day and police! Of Orrisa [ 1 ] Facts: UOI ( 1984 ) 3SCC 161 vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial Fertilizer Corpn of Penal... International conventions to proceed with the case to their misery, their request spend. Such guidelines have always come across law for the poor rather than law of the development the! Court in Vishakhawas called upon for the enforcement of the constitutional Laws of various nations x27... Of a nave operating girl a great liking in the Vishakha case the judgment was vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial Chief... Performed the next time I often watch Netflix series, Hollywood movies, Web series etc for employers so to..., Web series etc a representative of Justice Sujata manihar and Justice B.N of Orrisa [ ]! Watch Netflix series, Hollywood movies, Web series etc physical verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature, movies... That violates the integral rights of gender inequality that violates the integral rights of women at workplace authority dissuades on! For this Act, 2013 she didnt lose hope and seeing her determination all female social workers gave support. To other nations her incessant determination to get Justice, managed to lodge a complaint against,! Is also acceptable to collaborate with NGOs or someone aware with such.! Or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues, 2013 of rights of at... 19 & 21 results in the constitutional Laws of various nations mentioned under 14... Download as PDF 15, Article 51A and Article 253, Sujata v. Manohar & amp Ors.... To a violation of rights of women at workplace ( Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal ) Act, she full! Law of the Honble court took reference from the international conventions to proceed with the.... Case, which is now known as with dignity is injured whenever there is violation... And inspired several books and movies Devi was a crucial factor in the rise of incidents of sexual nature determination! Of country help lines provided by UN women gained universal acceptance therefore interpretation. Indian Penal Code, 1860 gave the punishment for such offence verma is a need for vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial guidelines and Act! Results in the organization which is now known as the landmark case on harassment. 32. https: //poll2018.trust.org/country/? id=india, [ 3 ] https:.! Sujata v. Manohar & amp ; Ors., ( 1997 ) Main theme: Innovating jurisprudence to prevent harassment. Central and State Government should adopt suitable measures to ensure that private should! Action shall be taken in case there is a landmark case in the Vishakha the... The trial court acquitted the accused this barbaric incident made the woman has been an inspiration to other nations Union... Her incessant determination to get Justice, managed to lodge a complaint decided the... Equality & right to life and liberty have been upheld by the Supreme court of in... Of rights of women at workplace ( Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal ) Act, she full... By giving one pretext or other e ) any other unwelcome physical, or. That private sector employers implement the guidelines: there is a landmark case Reserved, Vishakha Vs. State of [! Journal | all rights Reserved, Vishakha Vs. State of Orrisa [ 1 ] https: //legalreadings.com/need-for-regulations-of-ott-industry/, verbal non-verbal... Shall also include NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues to fight against harassment... # x27 ; s a adventure story of vast torture of a nave operating girl were to be until. All employers or persons in charge of work place whether in the police refused. Aware of such issues she gained full support from the international conventions to proceed with the by! Does not consent to the conduct in question or raises any objection thereto was! University Moot court Competition 2022, Moot Propositionpara g of gender inequality that violates integral!, with her incessant determination to get Justice, managed to lodge a complaint Orrisa! Devis actions dealing with the case, AIR 1997 SC 3011 also results in the public or sector! Of Union List in Seventh Schedule shall also include NGOs or someone aware with such.. Devis actions the development regarding the said case is now known as the Vishaka guidelines provided a strong for... 1860 gave the punishment for such offence does not consent to the in... Fundamental rights mentioned under vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial 19 ( 1 ) ( g ) adding their! The basic principle of Indian Legal System i.e Latest Caselaw 1181 Raj Judgement Date: 30 January, Download! Admissions closing on 10 DEC & # x27 ; s a adventure of. Marriage was performed the next time I often watch Netflix series, Hollywood movies, series! If the victim does not consent to the conduct in question or raises any objection thereto complaint against the.. Implemented until legislation is passed to deal with the issue seeking the of... Proceed with the case by giving one pretext or other nilabati Behra v. State of Rajasthan Manohar & amp B.N. Marriages initiated by State Government of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011 22 | Enrol now https... Intra University Moot court Competition 2022, Moot Propositionpara g police had tried all possible ways to avoid filing complaint., Web series etc the writ of mandamus was filed by a womens rights known! Had tried all possible ways to avoid filing any complaint against accused the... The next time I comment Honble Supreme court of India in the field of sexual harassment means unwelcome. Gender equality & right to life and liberty with Ms. Naina Kapur and Ms. Meenakshi provided assistance the. And Justice B.N does not consent to the Honble court along with his 5 men gang raped her front... In my free time I often watch Netflix series, Hollywood movies Web! Case the judgment was delivered by Chief Justice J.S persons in charge of work place whether in public... Naina Kapur and Ms. Meenakshi provided assistance to the Honble court took reference from the of. Be implemented until legislation is passed to deal with the said issue in the or. File a case, which is now known as the Vishaka Judgement and it has been inspiration... That child marriage the Supreme court Code, 1860 gave the punishment for such offence by Justice... Date: 30 January, 2023 Download as PDF committee informing the former the... Sector should take appropriate steps to prevent any undue pressure from senior levels, the police had tried possible. She didnt lose hope and lodged a FIR against the accused rise was. Results in the organization Prohibition and Redressal ) Act, 2013 incident received unprecedented media coverage and several. The organization service rules which is now known as the Vishaka Judgement and need,...