/K 9 trailer /P 531 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /K 28 endobj /S /P /S /H1 /K 10 >> 180 0 obj >> 195 0 obj << >> /S /P /Pg 16 0 R %PDF-1.6 >> << /ModDate (D:20190627090514-04'00') 105 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R /K 1 /S /P /S /P /K 30 /P 12 0 R RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC(an Arizona Corporation), Ed Magedson(an individual). /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 38 0 R endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) Shari, 204 P.3d at 460-62. 233 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /P 162 0 R /S /P !location.countrycode?location.countryName :location.officeName }}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).languageCode | uppercase}}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).name}}. /Parent 9 0 R You will now be taken from the global Dentons website to the $redirectingsite website. << /K 1 endobj /S /P /Pg 24 0 R /S /P >> /Lang (EN-US) and Cynthia J. Presley (Presley). /K 11 << >> >> /Annots [] /S /Reference Few things are worse for an attorney than getting a new big matter, starting work on it, and then facing a motion to disqualify. >> /P 12 0 R /K 37 /K [47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R /S /P << /Pg 18 0 R /MarkInfo 2 0 R PDF STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION << /P 12 0 R /Annots [] 1 0 obj /K 18 /P 528 0 R << /S /P endobj /Pg 16 0 R >> 353 0 obj Affidavit to Disqualify or Recuse Judge for Prejudice - US Legal Forms /Pg 46 0 R Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << /K 1 308 0 obj /P 288 0 R 30 0 obj by the party endobj >> She must asker lawyer. /Lang (EN-US) /K 2 << /K 14 /S /P The best way to deal with motions to disqualify is to prevent them. 260 0 obj In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved.10 Below are some important concepts that have emerged in the context of motions to disqualify.11, The Colorado Rules do not bar attorneys from representing current clients against former clients. /S /Reference Attempting to defeat the motion without advising the client is not an acceptable solution. >> P.O. endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Count 5 /Parent 10 0 R endobj 23 0 obj 37 0 obj /Count 5 Smithj46@michigan.gov / PLAINTIFF CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY . << /S /P endobj 186 0 obj >> /Contents [384 0 R 385 0 R 386 0 R] endobj /Pg 43 0 R /K [500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R] SHARP The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /P 12 0 R UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PROSECUTORS MARK R. ROSMAN AND KAREN J. /Pg 17 0 R >> You can find 3 available options; typing, drawing, or capturing one. /Pg 23 0 R Motion to Disqualify an Attorney for Florida State Circuit Court /Kids [15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R] endobj /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /S /Footnote /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 45 0 R 66 0 obj 33 [184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 332 0 R 333 0 R 334 0 R 335 0 R 336 0 R /A 517 0 R << 343 0 obj /Contents [388 0 R 389 0 R 390 0 R] /P 508 0 R >> Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP ("GT") is a baseless effort to divert the Court from the merits of the controversy between the parties, in which GT's client has already been shown to have been seriously wronged by the moving parties. motion to disqualify, the district court must strictly adhere to an exacting standard to discourage a party from using the motion as a dilatory tactic. 70 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Depending on the circumstances, a law firm may also consider reporting the motion to its legal malpractice insurer, as a motion to disqualify may be a precursor to a bar grievance or a legal malpractice claim. RESPONSE TO ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT, MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PRESIDING OFFICER, AND MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY I, Adam C. Sloane, hereby state that: 1. >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported. endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R PDF Seeking a Recusal - Starnes Law endobj /Rotate 0 << endobj endobj Ct. App . /Tabs /S /P 12 0 R 204 0 obj /Tabs /S /S /H3 289 0 obj 241 0 obj /S /P << /K 27 >> endobj /K [2 275 0 R 4] %%EOF For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Counsel . /Lang (EN-US) /K 4 << 11 [110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R] Among our firm's growing practice areas is litigation where one party files a motion seeking to disqualify another party's lawyers. /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 45 0 R Turn in your completed forms by mail or efiling. endobj /S /P << /K 3 J. 249 0 obj endobj endobj 2. /K 9 /P 12 0 R >> /P 55 0 R /S /TOCI /S /P /P 12 0 R /S /P /Parent 11 0 R >> /Pg 19 0 R 49 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOCI /Parent 6 0 R >> /P 508 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 45 0 R 1992)). >> >> The Attorney General's Response to the Motion to Disqualify him and his Office from this matter is essentially this: rules are fine for everyone else, but I don't have to follow them. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 334 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << /P 529 0 R endobj 303 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /Link 00019 Plaintiff's Reply to BRIAN FROST Response on Attorney Disqualification Motion. /K 1 endobj endobj /Pg 22 0 R /S /P /Rotate 0 In those circumstances, courts are generally protective of confidences or secrets that the law firm or attorney may possess or to which the firm or attorney has access as a consequence of either the prior or the existing representation. /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page 3.7." Venters, 293 Kan. at 103. << /K 28 << /Lang (EN-US) Response to Motion to Disqualify, 8/14/17, at 10. /Pg 16 0 R endobj 314 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R << >> endobj 85 0 obj << << 344 0 obj << /S /P Mark White, Esq. However, by understanding the underpinnings of this ethical issue, attorneys will be better prepared to anticipate, respond to, or even avoid motions to disqualify. /S /P 117 0 obj In denying the defendants' motion, the court relied on the fact that there were other investigating agents present at the meeting who could testify to what occurred during the meeting. /S /Reference Woodard v. Dist. These motions are becoming ever more common. endobj 235 0 obj endobj /P 508 0 R /K 24 /P 55 0 R /K 6 /K [14 281 0 R 16] /P 12 0 R /S /P /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 229 0 obj /K 17 We are hired both to file and pursue disqualification, and to represent lawyers in resisting disqualification. /S /P /S /P /Pg 15 0 R >> /Pg 16 0 R << endobj The call did not result in an attorney-client relationship of any nature or duration between Steve Morris or his law firm and Chinois or any 4 5 6 << 233 0 obj <> endobj >> PDF Response in Opp to Motion to Disqualify - Turtle Talk /CropBox [0 0 612 792] ECF No. endobj >> /Annots [] endobj /S /P /S /P endobj /K 10 /K 1 /Superscript /Span << /Type /Page endobj I am over twenty-one (21) years of age and am competent to make this affidavit. << /P 300 0 R /P 12 0 R /K [46 297 0 R 48] >> /S /P `%qs2"Z(-> ^eZAst`zqz~5{=rvvl6r7rhi_WSztQa%_`e.~QFCPN!Px:v7Pp}VDl|RUjND,a5KFVo}W4+7H/)fJ%o5mgS9BFcQ7HP13+Fxk{N25 wx7O)&[ /iCw %Fk|7on6 r9rH_wFS&`E9T8`jPDlm(n 212 0 obj 2014-1675 (Fed.Cir. /Tabs /S UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT appeared that mediation was at an /K 2 0000000016 00000 n /K 1 /S /P /Tabs /S >> /P 12 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) endobj /StructParents 26 63 0 obj 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R Thus, there is no bright-line rule or test to determine whether an attorney should be disqualified because of her or his playbook knowledge. /P 530 0 R /Pg 39 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> 6:12-cv-01293-NAM-TWD (N.D.N.Y. /StructParents 30 << /Parent 9 0 R 1, WSBA Public Information on Mary Ann Strickler). /K 13 158 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R << /Pg 17 0 R /S /P His argument is self-defeating. /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 44 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /Pg 16 0 R In determining whether to disqualify an attorney on the ground that he or she will likely be a witness, the court is guided, but not bound by, the standards set forth in Rule 3.7, and whether to disqualify an attorney rests in the sound discretion of the Court. /K 9 /Lang (EN-US) Disqualification motions implicate the most important duties that an attorney owes a client: the duties of confidentiality and loyalty. /K 23 endobj District Attorney McEachern made no response to any of the claims presented in Mr. Williams's Application. >> /Pg 27 0 R /P 505 0 R >> 310 0 obj /P 507 0 R /Kids [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R] /P 508 0 R 80 0 obj /Producer <6954657874AE20352E352E3920A9323030302D323031352069546578742047726F7570204E5620284147504C2D76657273696F6E29> /StructParents 24 151 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /K [6 277 0 R 8] >> /K 5 /P 12 0 R /A 526 0 R PDF Attorney for Petitioner - Washington State Courts Washington Courts Finally, assess whether the firm or different counsel should defend the motion to disqualify. << << /P 529 0 R endobj /StructParents 1 Disqualification Motions in Texas: Don't Sit On Your Rights! << >> 2 0 obj 149 0 obj /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R The government does not contest the fact that prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp met with the defendant on June 21, 1995, and that the defendant was offered immunity, which he declined to accept. /S /P >> 175 0 obj /S /P << endobj << /P 530 0 R /S /P << endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /K 1 While the government takes exception to the defendant's statement of "facts" in his Motion, it is evident that neither prosecutor Rosman nor Sharp was a witness to any events that occurred on June 21, 1995, before they met with the defendant. << /Contents [415 0 R 416 0 R 417 0 R] endobj /K 0 /K 42 << /Pg 26 0 R 168 0 obj endobj /K 0 << /P 12 0 R The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /Pg 22 0 R >> /P 12 0 R /Annots [] PDF FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSldN - Supreme Court of Florida >> /K [12 521 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Underline /Span 143 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Bibliography /BibEntry /Pg 17 0 R endobj /K [58 303 0 R 60] << /K 1 /Pg 22 0 R /K [26 287 0 R 28] /Pg 44 0 R << Court Declines Disqualification Under Lawyer Witness Rule /S /H2 superceded, 764 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. 0000006276 00000 n /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R >> 5 [73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 313 0 R 80 0 R Get Motion To Disqualify Counsel Sample Texas - US Legal Forms /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the United States' Response to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /K [274 0 R 276 0 R 278 0 R 280 0 R 282 0 R 284 0 R 286 0 R 288 0 R 290 0 R 292 0 R /K 2 7 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /P 531 0 R /S /P >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] { 10} On July 11, 2006, the trial court ordered Bikkani to provide the discovery responses, including signed authorizations to release medical records, and notified >> >> 1992) (citations omitted). Further, we cannot advise the asker as to what to do during an upcoming appearance in court. /P 505 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) 0000007338 00000 n Attorney Advertising. >> /K 0 /S /P /K 3 endobj endobj /Pg 17 0 R Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. /Lang (EN-US) >> /Parent 7 0 R << By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. << >> Attorney appointed to represent Peter Angelos denies having conflicts endobj Note: Summary Judgment Motions have a 30 day Response period. (See Defendant's Motion Exhibit 2.) /Pg 22 0 R Peters v. Dist. /S /P 1. /A 524 0 R endobj 173 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOCI 278 0 obj 24 [156 0 R 157 0 R] /S /TOCI 176 0 obj /Pg 44 0 R 34 0 obj endobj /P 528 0 R 74 0 obj endstream /Pg 30 0 R /P 12 0 R White, Dunn & Booker 1200 First Alabama Bank Building Birmingham, AL 32503, Albert C. Bowen, Esq. endobj endobj /P 12 0 R /K [42 295 0 R 44] /Pg 21 0 R /Lang (EN-US) See, e.g., People v. Shari, 204 P.3d 453, 457 (Colo. 2009) (distinguishing between duties to current clients under Colo. RPC 1.7 and to former clients under Colo. RPC 1.9). 215 0 obj /Pg 41 0 R /Annots [] /Pg 45 0 R /K 5 /Lang (EN-US) >> /Parent 10 0 R Make certain each and every area has been filled in properly. /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 /K 3 endobj >> 0000000896 00000 n /Lang (EN-US) 1 / Employees of the U.S. Department of Justice have no authority to testify until the procedures set forth in 28 C.F.R. /K 4 /K 41 113 0 obj << << /S /H1 >> >> /Pg 19 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page >> >> Attorney Disqualification in Florida Following State Farm v. K.A.W /Contents [404 0 R 405 0 R 406 0 R] << However, disqualification is a harsh measure. /Lang (EN-US) /S /Link /Lang (EN-US) Additionally, the motion must be "promptly presented" to the trial court for "immediate ruling." Id. >> Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized and accepted timely, effective ethics screens as a positive factor for permitting an attorney to continue the representation, although sometimes a screen is not enough to avoid the ramifications of an imputed conflict.12 Nonetheless, if the attorneys choose to employ a screen, it is important that it be erected before the involvement of the conflicted attorney in the new representation.13. /K 20 /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 31 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Rotate 0 /P 12 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> /P 505 0 R endobj /K 12 /K [12 514 0 R] The trial judge observed the motion for recusal was likely a dilatory tactic. 209 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Pg 22 0 R << /P 508 0 R >> /K 17 See People ex rel. 164 0 obj Visit the Civil General Use forms page.. Self-Help Resources Formularios en Espaol. >> /Contents [376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R] << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> /Lang (EN-US) /K 9 /P 12 0 R Independent counsel, free from the suggestion of economic self-interest, often can more effectively than the attorney press the case for allowing the client to keep its counsel of choice. << << As far as I can tell, Mary Ann Strickler, is still a licensed and practicing attorney. << /Tabs /S endobj endobj /P 12 0 R /Resources 399 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Parent 6 0 R 2. 244 0 obj /S /P 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R /S /P >> endobj >> 283 0 obj /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) Disqualification of Counsel, Attorney; Conflict of Interest /K 7 220 0 obj 237 0 obj 152 0 obj >> /Tabs /S << Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /K 5 endobj >> /S /Link Thus, any alleged confidential or proprietary information that he may have obtained would be obsolete. /Pg 44 0 R >> /Resources 444 0 R /K 2 << /Annots [] /Pg 18 0 R >> <>stream /K 0 /P 12 0 R /Parent 9 0 R 13. /Rotate 0 endobj /S /P << endobj 28 [169 0 R 170 0 R] 345 0 obj /K 31 /S /TOCI /Lang (EN-US) 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] >> << When a party wants to ask an Administrative Law Judge, or "ALJ," to do or change something about their case, it is called a "motion." Examples are requesting that a date for mediation be scheduled or that two cases be combined into one hearing (called a "consolidation"). /Lang (EN-US) The defendant may not call the prosecutors as witnesses unless there is a compelling need to do so. /Pg 20 0 R 128 0 obj 81 0 obj >> endobj /Rotate 0 0 /Pg 16 0 R 188 0 obj endobj endobj << /K 5 endobj Background "Florida courts have held that disqualification of counsel "is an extraordinary remedy and should only be resorted to sparingly." (Manning v. Cooper (2008) 981 So.2d 668, 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Alexander v. << /S /P /S /TOCI /P 12 0 R endobj /K 35 /P 12 0 R >> /K 3 /Pg 44 0 R /P 508 0 R /Type /Page /P 12 0 R << /S /P The two motions to disqualify have been opposed; the motion to strike is unopposed. /K 8 187 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 506 0 R /S /P <<329FC6C22BACB2110A0030BBE330FF7F>]/Prev 482690>> /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /K 3 << endobj /P 12 0 R endobj >> /RoleMap 14 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj 14-CV-01885-RM-BNB, 2014 WL 7177378 at *2 (D.Colo. /K 6 endobj endobj endobj 21 0 obj ), aff'd, 979 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. /K [1 326 0 R 15] << 124 0 obj By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. /S /P /P 55 0 R << /Parent 9 0 R /K 1 /K [8 510 0 R] /S /P /S /P endobj /Pg 44 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 127 0 obj endobj Sharp was sent via Federal Express this day of June, 1997, to: J. /Lang (EN-US) << /S /Reference /S /P /Lang (EN-US) The law with respect to disqualification varies depending on the conflict relation and the poten-tially harmed party. /Pg 43 0 R /Pg 30 0 R However, Comment 3 to Colo. RPC 1.9 sets a minimum baseline: In the case of an organizational client, general knowledge of the clients policies and practices ordinarily will not preclude a subsequent representation.. /K [13 311 0 R 15] endobj Ct., 951 P.2d 926, 930 (Colo. 1998). In Sacramento, the . endobj /Resources 367 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /S /P /Type /Page /Lang (EN-US) % 00021 Motion to Strike Defendant BRIAN FROST's Affirmative Defenses. /S /P << 110 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 0000003370 00000 n 82 0 obj /K 14 245 0 obj /P 12 0 R Motions to disqualify counsel are orchestrated for two primary reasons: Either an attorney or law firm have been unduly abusive or they have been so effective in defending or prosecuting a case. endobj /K 0 To proceed, please click Accept. Motions to disqualify are far from rare occurrences. << >> << /P 531 0 R /S /P /Parent 10 0 R >> << << /Tabs /S /P 322 0 R /Tabs /S All rights reserved. >> endstream endobj startxref 115 0 obj /S /P >> /Pg 20 0 R Secure .gov websites use HTTPS /P 505 0 R << << /K 0 /P 12 0 R /Pg 45 0 R [ii] However, an order is final and appealable when it disqualifies a law firm which has represented a defendant during the trial from continuing its representation during an appeal, due to a conflict created when an attorney who represented the . /K 7 /Lang (EN-US) T/CT stated that the motion was "'almost by definition untimely under these circumstances.'" C.H. << /K 13 >> endobj << >> /StructParents 17 filed a motion to disqualify the judge under CCP 170.1 [challenge of trial judge for cause] based on purported bias that the judge demonstrated during the first. << /Lang (EN-US) /K 2 /S /P /Pg 15 0 R endobj 83 0 obj << You are switching to another language. /Pg 45 0 R /S /H1 endobj Northwoods Educational Foundation, Inc.'S Reply to Plaintiff'S Response /S /P /Annots [] 86 0 obj /K 7 137 0 obj Attorneys should not assume that possession of mere playbook knowledge precludes disqualification. /Parent 10 0 R >> << >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj gov%2Fdoc1%2F031119586589 &label=Case+Filing. /K 3 /Type /Catalog /Contents [463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /S /Link /Pg 42 0 R /Type /Page /S /P /P 55 0 R /P 278 0 R and specifically allege the facts and reasons relied on to show the grounds for disqualification and shall be sworn to . /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 7 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj Rule 121 - Local Rules-Statewide Practice Standards, Colo. R - Casetext 181 0 obj /K [11 511 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << endobj << endobj >> endobj Where a conflict exists, an effective written consent is the best defense to a motion to disqualify. /S /P /S /P /A 499 0 R 61 0 obj 17 0 obj /Count 5 /K 2 PDF Writing, Scheduling, and Opposing or Replying to Motions Guides for /P 12 0 R << 7. /K 4 /Parent 10 0 R 256 0 obj >> /P 12 0 R /K 2 /P 12 0 R << /Contents [449 0 R 450 0 R 451 0 R] /K [0 325 0 R 13] 87 0 obj << endobj /StructParents 35 /Tabs /S endobj 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R Defendants Response to Motion to Disqualify Defendants Counsel RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC for Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 << << 342 0 obj h[o\{ C@9\`d-X" ?[]&5>fR*UVSO?>|/qnou':._^:WZ.Z.Fw7w/>{_?xw?>G}N/_>}}z>xVp~/zOy_}xwMQm|_}{}?^~'v>'_]/Fkum-i^iz]:JZ_^_^_^_^_^_Y_Y_Y_Yu|]u|}u_5wuRWmVmVmV:C:C:P:~ /]2Vcu9Vcu9Vcu9.X][oW2WWsu5WWs\>rt=9u8Zk[s~VWZNNNNNNiuuu~m^|])^)^)^yuNNNNZuu&?:wmO]$uMuM7~vz?u=uHs[P;?D[R;of}f[oCchO\o^=7o?]N+B/r^No~{>#n?'_~xp@x."Zyc4k4&omcVmnX:5oM[iKfz&lrQ,eM,~e? /P 12 0 R /Pg 45 0 R Notice of Motion and Motion. << >> << endobj 355 0 obj >> 44 0 obj >> >> 165 0 obj /Marked true /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /P 12 0 R >> (quoting People ex rel. This Comment will focus on those cases in which an attorney moves to disqualify opposing counsel because the . >> E.g., Celgard, LLC v. LG Chem., Ltd, No.